Read my article on the threat of Youth Unemployment
The recent media circus  surrounding the Raoul Moat case did lead to some interesting discussion  about the ‘lost generation’ of working class men who have lost their  standing in society as a result of the steady decline in manufacturing  since the 1980s.
Numerous commentators discussed  fathers and their sons who have spent much of their lives on benefits  and with little or no expectation of finding work. This is an issue  across the UK, though one more noticeable in the former industrial  heartlands of the North, and especially former mining towns that  experienced mass unemployment after the pit closures of the Thatcher  years.
In the vast majority of these  towns, little or no thought was given to the effects of long term  unemployment on successive generations, or to the very working of these  communities. Small business closures, divorce rates, crime and drug and  alcohol addiction all increased in these areas.
As the new coalition continues to  talk only of cuts and directing them almost exclusively at the poor, we  fear that Cameron will be repeating the mistakes of Margaret Thatcher  at her most vile in ignoring the social group which is most likely to  suffer in the next five years.
The combination of public service  job cuts, a reduction in university places, the abolition of the future  jobs fund all point to a bleak future for today’s youth. This is a real  life consequence of Osborne’s inflexibility when pushing for spending  cuts above and beyond any reasoning. What practical solutions are being  offered? None.
To top it off, the Connexions  youth careers service has started to downsize as a result of pressure  on local government to make spending cuts. This service, which has  encountered criticism in the past, does however operate in a vital space  dealing with young people not in education, employment or training  (‘NEETs’), and there is radio silence from the government in terms of  what alternative service will be offered, just when it is needed most.
Last year the Prince’s trust  conducted a survey of 2000 young people, which found that the young  unemployed were more likely to feel ashamed, rejected, lost, anxious,  insecure, down and depressed, isolated and unloved. Many reported having  suicidal thoughts. The long term implications of rising youth  unemployment are frightening, especially as this recession is affecting  graduates as well as school leavers, many of whom are bringing with them  the new social burden of huge student debt.
The government owes it to the  electorate to offer some hope and practical solution to our young  people. It is simply not acceptable to dismantle the structure that has  been built to ensure we never return to such horrific youth unemployment  as we experienced in the 1980s when over one million youths were  registered unemployed – not to mention the two million plus who were not  in education or training, causing tension and unrest in Britain’s inner  cities.
In 2009, in the middle of the  latest recession, the figure approached three-quarters of a million. But  the Labour government’s future jobs fund, largely funded by the one-off  bankers’ bonus tax, had positive results, with many young people having  their 6 month placements extended. The scrapping of this successful  scheme points to the short-sightedness of the coalition and the distinct  absence of positivity or creativity in Osborne’s fiscal policy.
A new government should be coming  to power with ideas and determination to enhance opportunities for  youth, not limit them. According to Martina Milburn, chief executive of  the Prince’s trust, youth unemployment costs the economy £10m a day in  lost productivity. We need action, an emphasis on vocational training,  opportunities within the green economy and real projects to target areas  with severe skills shortages.
Will these vulnerable young  adults be left without any support in what will be an increasingly harsh  world of lower benefits and housing allowances? What will the  government’s reaction be to the inevitable increase in crime and  substance abuse that we are likely to see in certain communities? It is  here than the policy of across the board cuts once again implodes.  Making job cuts, cutting education and training resources as well as  reducing benefits creates a black hole for individuals; but concurrently  slashing policing and prison budgets signals dramatic consequences for  society as a whole. This is an issue that threatens to be a national  crisis as headline unemployment seems likely to rise next year.
Labour needs to ensure that we  are organised, vocal and dynamic in opposition and have plenty to offer  on this subject if we are to engage with the youth. More importantly, we  must make sure that we don’t lose what should be our best-educated,  most internationally focused and most technologically advanced  generation of young people in British history.
We need to work with and support  community groups, social enterprises and careers services that will be  the only hope for many in a twisted version of Cameron’s Big Society.
I started this blog on May 5th 2010, one day before the election. I feared the Tories would come to power and I wanted to track what this would mean for the ordinary people on the street. Unexpectedly the result of the election has made me actively involved in politics and I am now becoming increasingly active in my local Labour Party with ambitious plans to do more. I am working, with a 9 month old baby but I intend to keep this blog as up to date as possible. Any comments welcome!
Rachel forwarded a copy of the article you have written, it’s brilliant. An excellent example of positive lobbying on behalf of young people and the service. There is little to no media attention regarding the cuts to Youth Connexions Services, so it is good to read something that talks of a service that is needed so positively.
ReplyDeleteAcross Connexions West-there were 10% cuts earlier this year and a further 30% is happening as we speak. In Bristol we find out if we have a job at the end of this month. Youth unemployment in Bristol continues to rise. There is no decision yet how services will manage this with the level of cuts about to happen.
Having worked with some of the most hard to reach young people in the city, most likely to become ‘NEET’ and with multiple barriers to employment, education and training, I continually bridge gaps between services. The gaps will widen significantly. I am about to visit a young man who has not attended school for 2-3 academic years and now officially leaving school he will not come out of his home to engage with anything that is being offered in his community. If I didn’t knock on his door and offer a service he would receive no support. Yes, he may walk into the job centre tomorrow to claim JSA but are these professionals trained to listen to, engage and support such vulnerable young people- do they have skills to make a difference to the young people that you refer to in your article? I feel upset and concerned about the future for young people in this county. The government does owe it to the electorate to offer some hope and practical solution to our young people- you have def hit the nail on the head there for me.